Marriott case notes

For example, in our calculations, we found that McDonalds beta greatly influences the market beta because of the company magnitude in our weighted average calculation.

It is the weighted average of the cost of company debt and the cost of company equity — which is mathematically the same as the weighted-average of the divisional costs of capital weighted based on net identifiable assets.

What business is Marriott in? How can you estimate its equity costs without publicly traded comparable companies? Gives students the opportunity to explore how a company uses the Capital Asset Pricing Model CAPM to compute the cost of capital for each of its divisions.

Did you use arithmetic or geometric averages to measure average rates of returns or premia? We therefore decided to reverse out the unlevered beta of Contract Services due to having the knowledge of the other inputs in the calculation, i.

However, the restaurants given for the calculation were mostly fast-food chains while Marriott operates rather middle-level restaurants.

They decided to focus on managing instead of owning hotel assets, invest in projects that increased shareholder value, optimize the use of debt in the capital structure and repurchase Marriott case notes shares.

We chose a risk-free rate for the floating-rate debt of 5. With only one competitor being represented, there seems to be a lack of data in the Contract Services area.

Case illustrates the impact of an error in setting a hurdle rate. The company equity can be viewed as a portfolio in which the divisional equities are individual investments. However, information about comparable companies for contract services division is not available.

Since there is no pure way of determining the correct hurdle rate, because we cannot observe it in the market, we must determined the rate by comparing our line of business to companies in the same line of business those that have the most similar risk classes.

How did you estimate the required rate of return on the debt of the company and on the divisions? When hurdle rate is too high, fewer projects would be considered profitable and preset value of project inflows would be reduced. This model takes risk-free rate, beta, and risk premium for each division as for Marriott as a whole.

The cost of capital for the contract services is The grouping can be seen in table 3. The weighted-average method rather than a simple arithmetic-average method was used to allow a more accurate Bu of the overall industry.

What risk-free rate and risk premium did you use to calculate the cost of equity?Reaching Marriott Rewards customer service is easy whether it is through the Marriott Rewards phone number, email, fax or regular mail.

The Marriott Rewards® Premier Plus Credit Card – Official Cardmember Site: Earn more of what you love with 6X points per \$1 at Marriott locations, 2X points on every purchase, plus perks, protection and so much more.

Marriott International, Inc. Hospitality, Travel and Leisure Case Study Marriott Transforms Key Finance Processes.

The lodging leader develops a. Marriott Corp Cost of Capital Case Solution,Marriott Corp Cost of Capital Case Analysis, Marriott Corp Cost of Capital Case Study Solution, Marriott Corporation The Cost Of Capital Case Study Analysis 1.

Introduction: The case presents a company, named “Marriott Corporation” (MC), possessing. Marriott Bedding Program CASE STUDY Marriott Bedding Program Marriott International Uses Project Management to Upgrade Bedding Worldwide Headquartered in Washington, DC, Marriott International, Inc.

is one of the leading hospitality companies in the world with more than 2, properties in 68 countries and territories. Marriott Case Notes Words | 9 Pages. a. What business is Marriott in? Are the four components of Marriott’s financial strategy consistent with its growth objective?

b. How does Marriott use its estimate of its cost of capital? Does this make sense? c. What is the weighted average cost of capital for Marriott Corporation?

Marriott case notes
Rated 4/5 based on 38 review